ArticleCureus2026
Real-World Evaluation of the Episoft® AC Moisturizer With Broad-Spectrum Sunscreen in the Management of Retinoid-Induced Dermatitis: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Retinoids are essential in acne management but frequently cause retinoid‑induced dermatitis (RID), characterized by erythema, dryness, burning, and barrier disruption. This study evaluated the real‑world effectiveness and tolerability of Episoft® AC (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Mumbai, India), a fixed-dose combination moisturizer with broad‑spectrum sunscreen, in patients experiencing RID. Methods This study was a retrospective, multicentric observational analysis of medical records of acne patients with RID, conducted across 357 dermatology clinics in India, following an independent ethics committee approval (approval no. GSER/2024/BMR-AP/133). The study included 1364 patients who had been prescribed Episoft® AC for managing RID. The mean age was 24.49 years (SD ±5.16), and both male and female participants were included. Subjective symptoms (itching, burning, stinging, tightness) and objective signs (erythema, dark spots, dryness, roughness) were assessed at baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 using a four‑point Likert severity scale. Corneometer‑based skin hydration and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. The primary endpoint was reduction in dermatitis symptoms; secondary endpoints were Corneometer-measured skin hydration and overall tolerability. Results A total of 1039 (76%) patients were prescribed a topical retinoid or combination, most commonly 0.1% adapalene + 2.5% benzoyl peroxide (BPO), and 294 (22%) were prescribed oral isotretinoin. Significant improvement was observed across all parameters. By Week 4, complete resolution was reported by 68.7% of patients for itching, by 88.44% for burning, by 69.9% patients for stinging, by 72.63% for tightness, and by 61.69% patients for erythema. In addition, physicians observed significant improvement in dark spots (74.42%), dryness (70.59%), and roughness (73.73%). Hydration improved by 39.91% on Corneometer assessment. AEs were considered predominantly retinoid-associated based on clinical context; definitive causality attribution was not feasible given the retrospective, single-arm, uncontrolled design. Only 1.17% reported mostly mild‑to‑moderate AEs, which were associated with retinoid use. Conclusion Episoft® AC substantially improved the tolerance of topical and systemic retinoid therapy, reducing dermatitis symptoms, enhancing skin hydration, and demonstrating excellent safety. It represents a practical adjunct to support adherence and mitigate RID in routine dermatology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.