Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281813›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science

Plasma lactate and severity of illness for acute pulmonary embolism: A Bayesian probability model.

Amado Alejandro Báez, Faith Ibu, Helena Halasz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amado Alejandro BáezDepartment of Biomedical Research, Pedro Henriquez Ureña National University, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Faith IbuDepartment of Biomedical Research, Pedro Henriquez Ureña National University, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Helena HalaszDepartment of Biomedical Research, Pedro Henriquez Ureña National University, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Plasma lactate >2 mmol/L has been associated with increased mortality in acute pulmonary embolism (PE), even among hemodynamically stable patients. Despite strong evidence, lactate remains underutilized in risk stratification tools such as the simplified PE Severity Index (sPESI). To assess the incremental prognostic value of plasma lactate when integrated into a Bayesian probability model for Pulmonary Embolism. Methods: Pretest probabilities were defined by SI and sPESI. Sensitivity and specificity for plasma lactate >2 mmol/L were derived from prior meta-analyses and validated multicenter datasets. Likelihood ratios were applied within a Bayesian nomogram to estimate posttest probabilities. Diagnostic efficiency was evaluated using Bayesian Diagnostic Gain (BDG) and Bayesian Number Needed to Diagnose (BNND). Results: Thirty-day mortality for SI >1 was 24.1% versus 10.7% for low-risk SI and 10.7% versus 1.5% for sPESI. Lactate >2 mmol/L yielded 82.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.8-95.3) and 73.5% specificity (95% CI: 71.8-74.4). Integrating lactate into the SI model produced an Absolute Diagnostic Gain (ADG) of 25.9% (BNND = 4), outperforming the sPESI model (ADG: 16.3%, BNND = 6). Conclusions: Bayesian integration of plasma lactate with the SI enhances prognostic accuracy and produces superior diagnostic gains compared with sPESI-based models. This supports a probabilistic, physiology-driven approach to PE risk stratification.

Indexed as

Bayesiancritical careearly warningpulmonary embolismShock Index

Identifiers

PMID42281813
PMCPMC13252673

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.