ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science
Plasma lactate and severity of illness for acute pulmonary embolism: A Bayesian probability model.
Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plasma lactate >2 mmol/L has been associated with increased mortality in acute pulmonary embolism (PE), even among hemodynamically stable patients. Despite strong evidence, lactate remains underutilized in risk stratification tools such as the simplified PE Severity Index (sPESI). To assess the incremental prognostic value of plasma lactate when integrated into a Bayesian probability model for Pulmonary Embolism. Methods: Pretest probabilities were defined by SI and sPESI. Sensitivity and specificity for plasma lactate >2 mmol/L were derived from prior meta-analyses and validated multicenter datasets. Likelihood ratios were applied within a Bayesian nomogram to estimate posttest probabilities. Diagnostic efficiency was evaluated using Bayesian Diagnostic Gain (BDG) and Bayesian Number Needed to Diagnose (BNND). Results: Thirty-day mortality for SI >1 was 24.1% versus 10.7% for low-risk SI and 10.7% versus 1.5% for sPESI. Lactate >2 mmol/L yielded 82.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.8-95.3) and 73.5% specificity (95% CI: 71.8-74.4). Integrating lactate into the SI model produced an Absolute Diagnostic Gain (ADG) of 25.9% (BNND = 4), outperforming the sPESI model (ADG: 16.3%, BNND = 6). Conclusions: Bayesian integration of plasma lactate with the SI enhances prognostic accuracy and produces superior diagnostic gains compared with sPESI-based models. This supports a probabilistic, physiology-driven approach to PE risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.