ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science
Prognostic value of hematological ratios in sepsis: A prospective observational study of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios.
Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Back to basics in critical care: Can hematological ratios refine sepsis risk stratification?International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of high-risk sepsis patients remains a clinical priority. Hematological ratios such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) have emerged as potential prognostic biomarkers reflecting systemic inflammation and immune dysregulation in sepsis. To evaluate the prognostic significance of NLR, PLR, and MLR in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis, including mortality, hospital stay duration, and need for mechanical ventilation. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional observational study included 200 adult patients (>18 years) with clinically diagnosed sepsis admitted to a tertiary care hospital from January 2023 to March 2025. Complete blood counts were used to calculate NLR, PLR, and MLR. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was used to assess organ dysfunction. Statistical comparisons were performed using Results: Higher NLR and MLR values were significantly associated with prolonged hospital stay ( Conclusion: NLR and MLR serve as reliable prognostic indicators in sepsis and correlate significantly with disease severity and outcomes. Their inclusion in the initial sepsis workup may support early risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.