ArticleResearch square2026
Two fork protection complexes at the replication fork play distinct roles in fork progression and stress response.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
TIMELESS, together with TIPIN and CLASPIN, forms the Fork Protection Complex (FPC), an essential regulator of DNA replication that possesses multiple functions in genome stability including the regulation of fork progression and replication checkpoint signaling. Structural studies place TIMELESS at the leading edge of the CMG helicase, which is inconsistent with FPC functions at the lagging strand and on single-stranded DNA. Our observation that FPC chromatin loading during replication initiation started in G1 phase cells, but was also enhanced by DNA synthesis, led us to propose a model of a step-wise loading of the FPC with two TIMELESS molecules per replication fork. Split-TurboID proximity labelling supported this model, placing the second FPC in proximity to the lagging strand. Using an auxin-inducible degron, we show that TIMELESS depletion compromised chromatin loading of TIPIN and CLASPIN, but the TIMELESS mutant unable to bind MCM still supported CLASPIN and TIPIN chromatin loading. This mutant was proficient in replication checkpoint activation, but failed to regulate fork speed under both unperturbed and oxidative-stress conditions. We propose that two distinct FPC instances at each replication fork: one at the leading edge, regulating fork progression, and one at the lagging strand mediating checkpoint signaling, - together execute the essential functions of TIMELESS.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.