ReviewEuropean heart journal open2026
The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation in the hospitalized medical patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia occurring in hospitalized patients. NOAF confers a significant risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the form of symptomatic tachyarrhythmia, heart failure, stroke and sudden cardiac death. It is unclear what the cumulative incidence of NOAF is in the hospitalized medical (non-surgical) patient. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies published between 01 January 2000 and 10 March 2026. All studies reporting the cumulative incidence of NOAF in hospitalized medical (non-surgical) patients were included. The pooled cumulative incidence of NOAF, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and 95% prediction intervals (PI) were computed using a random-effects model. The inconsistency index (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.