ReviewCampbell systematic reviews2026
Protocol: Psychosocial Interventions Addressing Mental Health Outcomes Among Hospital-Based Healthcare Workers in United States Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Campbell systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare workers employed in hospital settings face significant occupational stressors that place them at elevated risk for a range of mental health outcomes, including burnout, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, secondary traumatic stress, compassion fatigue, and moral injury. These challenges carry serious consequences for healthcare worker well-being, patient safety, care quality, and workforce retention. Despite growing recognition of this crisis and recent federal legislation allowing funding to address healthcare worker mental health, no comprehensive synthesis exists identifying which psychosocial interventions are most effective for this population in the United States. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the effects of psychosocial interventions on mental health outcomes among healthcare workers employed in United States hospital settings, to identify moderators or intervention effectiveness, and to provide actionable evidence to inform program development, resource allocation, and policy implementation. Methods: We will search eight electronic databases and complete an extensive grey literature search to identify studies published from 2010 to present. Eligible study designs include randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster randomized controlled trials (CRCTs), and quasi-experimental designs (QEDs) with a control group examining psychosocial interventions delivered within or through hospital-affiliated systems in the United States. Participants will include hospital-based healthcare workers who provide direct clinical care. Primary outcomes include burnout, depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), secondary traumatic stress, vicarious trauma, compassion fatigue, and moral injury, assessed using validated measures. Secondary outcomes include turnover intention and turnover rates, extracted when reported. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data. Risk of bias will be assessed using the ROB 2 tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I V2 tool for QEDs. Where sufficient data are available, meta-analyses will be conducted using a random-effects model with robust variance estimation (RVE) to account for dependent effect sizes. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the Q statistic and I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.