Evidence mapPaperPMID 42282107Full record

ArticleBioImpacts : BI2026

Pharmacists in modern primary care and management of diseases: an evidence-based perspective on emerging technologies.

Jaleh Barar, Yadollah Omidi

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BioImpacts : BI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jaleh BararDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Barry and Judy Silverman College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0105-919X
Yadollah OmidiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Barry and Judy Silverman College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0067-2475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern healthcare demands warrant the reconceptualization of pharmaceutical practitioners as primary caregivers capable of addressing contemporary medical challenges. Their specialized knowledge in molecular therapeutics, computational medicine tools, and physiological surveillance technologies uniquely qualifies them to oversee complicated treatment protocols for cutting-edge interventions, including genomic modifications and targeted biological agents. Historical success in managing long-term metabolic and cardiovascular conditions establishes credibility for supervising precision medicine applications. Digital innovations (e.g., remote consultation systems, algorithmic forecasting, and distributed ledger prescription tracking) enhance their capacity to coordinate fragmented services while responding to infectious outbreaks and polypharmacy challenges in elderly populations. This evolution promises decreased emergency admissions, improved therapeutic compliance, and more cost-effective care delivery. Regulatory reform must eliminate practice limitations, enabling these accessible professionals to address population health requirements fully.

Indexed as

Advanced therapeuticsDigital health technologyHealthcare policy reformInterprofessional collaborationPharmaceutical care expansionPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID42282107
PMCPMC13250484

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.