ArticleDigital health
Pregnant women's experiences of the digital self-care program
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Few pregnant women meet activity guidelines, and about half experience pelvic girdle pain (PGP), with 10% developing chronic symptoms. PGP is multifactorial and tailored physical activity and exercise can reduce pain. A web-based self-care program, Women-In-Motion (WIM), was developed to support physical activity during pregnancy and help prevent and manage PGP. Aim: The study aim was to explore pregnant women's experiences with and perceptions of WIM for managing physical activity and PGP to optimize quality of life during pregnancy. A second aim was to use the results for improvements of WIM. Method: A qualitative approach was employed using focus groups, conducted digitally or in hybrid formats. Pregnant women, gestational weeks <30, were invited. The participants had access to the program one to five weeks prior to focus groups. All sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a combination of Krueger and Casey's constant comparison method and Graneheim and Lundman's inductive content analysis. Results: Four focus groups were conducted with pregnant women (n=17), representing variation in parity, exercise habits, and experiences of PGP. The analysis resulted in an overarching theme: Conclusion: Overall, participants experienced the WIM program to enhance their confidence, and their shared perceptions of diverse needs will inform program revisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.