Evidence mapPaperPMID 42282248Full record

ArticleDigital health

Pregnant women's experiences of the digital self-care program

Bodil Halvarsson, Annelie Gutke, Joanna Kvist, Jo Nijs, Mari Lundberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bodil HalvarssonDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2538-4207
Annelie GutkeDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-9769
Joanna KvistUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Medicine and Caring Science Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-5488
Jo NijsDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4976-6563
Mari LundbergPain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7123-0362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few pregnant women meet activity guidelines, and about half experience pelvic girdle pain (PGP), with 10% developing chronic symptoms. PGP is multifactorial and tailored physical activity and exercise can reduce pain. A web-based self-care program, Women-In-Motion (WIM), was developed to support physical activity during pregnancy and help prevent and manage PGP. Aim: The study aim was to explore pregnant women's experiences with and perceptions of WIM for managing physical activity and PGP to optimize quality of life during pregnancy. A second aim was to use the results for improvements of WIM. Method: A qualitative approach was employed using focus groups, conducted digitally or in hybrid formats. Pregnant women, gestational weeks <30, were invited. The participants had access to the program one to five weeks prior to focus groups. All sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a combination of Krueger and Casey's constant comparison method and Graneheim and Lundman's inductive content analysis. Results: Four focus groups were conducted with pregnant women (n=17), representing variation in parity, exercise habits, and experiences of PGP. The analysis resulted in an overarching theme: Conclusion: Overall, participants experienced the WIM program to enhance their confidence, and their shared perceptions of diverse needs will inform program revisions.

Indexed as

digital interventionexercisefocus groupspelvic girdle painpregnancypreventionsupportuser centered design

Identifiers

PMID42282248
PMCPMC13250426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.