ArticleBioinformation2026
Impact of sensitisation workshop on empathy levels among postgraduate students: A pre-post interventional study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empathy plays a vital role in patient-centered care, especially in obstetrics and gynaecology, where patients frequently encounter sensitive and emotionally challenging circumstances. This single-center pre-post interventional study involved 75 postgraduate students from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal. The intervention was a one-day structured program featuring interactive lectures, educational videos, scenario-based group activities and role-plays. Initial empathy scores were notably low (mean 88.2 ± 7.8). Post-workshop, scores rose markedly to 124.3 ± 8.1 (p < 0.0001). At the eight-week mark, scores decreased to 107.8 ± 9.4 but stayed significantly above baseline (p < 0.0001). The percentage of students achieving high-empathy status (scores ≥116) grew from 21.33% pre-workshop to 33.3% at follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.