Articlenpj women's health2026
A Foundation Model for Capturing Complexity of Menstrual Health Data.
Article in npj women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite its centrality to women's health, the menstrual cycle remains understudied in computational health research due to its complexity, variability, and limited data availability. Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities for modeling large-scale, user-generated menstrual health data. We introduce and evaluate a generative foundation model trained on self-tracked data from over 1.2 million users of a widely used menstrual tracking app. We assess the model's ability to generate physiologically plausible synthetic cycles and realistic tracking behaviors, examine whether learned representations capture meaningful temporal and symptomatic patterns, and evaluate privacy risks. Results show that the model produces high-fidelity synthetic data closely mirroring real-world users, with no evidence of data leakage, while learned representations consistently outperform baseline methods on downstream forecasting tasks. These findings highlight generative AI's potential to advance menstrual health forecasting, support privacy-sensitive data sharing, and enable scientific inquiry in women's health research.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.