ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Improving Measurement Efficiency of the Cough Severity Index With Item Response Theory.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe larynx is central to voice, breathing, swallowing, and cough-such that routinely tracking related outcomes can introduce burden. Within these assessments, the Cough Severity Index (CSI) is frequently deployed. We thus utilized item response theory (IRT) to determine: (1) which items confer the most information, (2) if proposed 5-item scales yield substantially differing discrimination and location parameters, compared to the 10-item instrument, and (3) whether a subset of items has more favorable characteristics as an initial assessment (i.e., for whether all 10 items are needed).
methodsItem discrimination, location, and information parameters were calculated from 4240 consecutive CSI responses. Based on these data, 5-item subsets were proposed, evaluated, and compared with each other and the 10-item instrument via information function curves and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analyses. Performance of 5-item mean scores < 1 as a potential initial assessment for the full results was also assessed.
resultsDiscrimination parameters ranged from 0.65-2.76, with the greatest discrimination in items about embarrassment or avoiding places due to cough. These data, along with residual item correlations and location parameters, delineated a 5-item subset, which also incorporated cough when lying down, affecting voice, and upset by cough for comparative analysis. ROC-AUCs revealed no difference between the 5-item subset and parent 10-item instrument in ability to discriminate cough-specific clinical diagnoses. One 5-item subset performed better as an initial assessment (mean 4.9, 95% CI 4.7-5.2).
conclusionIRT data identified a 5-item CSI subset which reflects the cough trait and provides an initial efficient assessment mechanism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.