Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42283405›Full record

ArticleJournal of community psychology2026

Can I Help With That? The Role of Goal Setting in a Technology-Enabled Peer Mentoring Program.

Emily Hersch, Alexandra Werntz, Yangyang Deng, Megyn Jasman, Jean Rhodes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily HerschDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1573-9396
Alexandra WerntzDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-8204
Yangyang DengDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9015-4881
Megyn JasmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5267-4352
Jean RhodesDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1469-6948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

College students face significant mental health and academic challenges and often struggle to navigate university resources. Students from marginalized backgrounds face additional barriers to help-seeking and are less likely to utilize campus services. Peer mentoring programs can help bridge this gap and are most effective when they are goal-focused. Technology can help scale these programs by offering mentee-mentor pairs a structured approach to setting goals and facilitating mentors' ability to provide targeted support. In this study, we explored a peer-mentoring platform that enabled incoming first-year college students to message their mentors and track goals. Goal setting was significantly associated with students' grade point average at the end of their first semester. After controlling for platform engagement, goal setting remained a significant predictor of self-efficacy and life satisfaction. Goal setting within peer mentoring relationships may serve as a brief, scalable intervention to promote academic success and well-being during the transition to college.

Indexed as

GoalsMentoringPeer GroupStudentsAcademiaAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMentorsPersonal SatisfactionSelf EfficacyUniversitiesYoung Adultacademic successcollege studentsgoal settingpeer mentoringtechnologyunderrepresented studentswell‐being

Identifiers

PMID42283405
PMCPMC13262020

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.