ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Building the foundation: Training, stakeholder engagement, and planning for Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) implementation in Uganda.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early and ongoing stakeholder engagement is critical to the development and implementation of scalable behavioral health interventions. Our overarching goal in this implementation research study was to understand and document the process of planning and rolling out Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA), a transdiagnostic mental health intervention, in Uganda. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0, we conducted in-depth interviews with multilevel stakeholders (healthcare providers, MOH members, clinic managers, implementing partners, n = 20) to understand and document the process of planning and rolling out CETA in Western Uganda. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically in Dedoose using a codebook based on CFIR 2.0 domains and constructs. Multilevel stakeholder engagement supported strategic decision making at each stage. Early endorsement of CETA by Uganda's MOH was instrumental in facilitating program integration. Ministry of Health leadership guided facility selection, while clinic leaders identified trainees positioned to implement CETA. Training incorporated both didactic and participatory methods, including real-time adaptation of intervention content for contextual relevance and identification of "champion" trainees to serve as supervisors as part of the ongoing support supervision infrastructure. During rollout, an incremental implementation strategy facilitated integration into clinic workflows. Ongoing multilevel stakeholder supervision and technical assistance helped CETA deliverers troubleshoot challenges, maintain fidelity, and gain confidence. Together, these processes enabled expansion beyond the initial pilot sites, providing early evidence of stakeholder-perceived feasibility and identifying foundational conditions for scalability. Continued engagement with policymakers, those delivering CETA, and community stakeholders will be essential to refine CETA implementation and support integration into national mental health strategies. By reframing stakeholder engagement as an implementation strategy that builds enduring, locally led infrastructures, this study offers a replicable model for preparing behavioral health interventions for scale-up in low resource settings and advances implementation research in global mental health.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.