ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2026
Externally Validated Machine Learning Models for 30-/90-/180-Day Unplanned Readmission After Head and Neck Cancer Hospitalizations in the United States.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReadmissions after head and neck cancer (HNC) hospitalizations are common and costly. We developed and externally validated machine learning (ML) models to predict unplanned readmissions across short- and longer-term horizons. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we included adult nonelective admissions with ≥1 malignant HNC diagnosis code. Models were trained on 2016-2019 discharges and externally tested on 2020 (N = 57,201). We engineered 247 discharge time predictors and trained multiple ML models, with thresholds selected by maximizing out-of-fold F1. We evaluated discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility via decision curve analysis and interpretability using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).
resultsIn external testing, XGBoost had the best discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.725/0.746/0.756 for 30/90/180-day readmission). Calibration was acceptable, and decision curve analysis showed net benefit over treat all/none across 10%-30% thresholds. Key predictors by SHAP included artificial airway/nutrition openings, discharge timing/disposition, and severity proxies.
conclusionA ML model, specifically XGBoost trained on a large set of administrative and clinical data, can effectively predict both short- and long-term unplanned readmission risk in patients with HNC and may support targeted discharge planning to improve outcomes and reduce costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.