ArticleBlood advances2026
High-risk single-refractory and double-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: feasibility and impact of alloHCT.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThis study aimed to compare the prognosis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) harboring TP53 abnormalities or a complex karyotype who are refractory to a covalent Bruton kinase inhibitors (cBTKi) or B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors (BCL2i; single-refractory high-risk [SRHR] genetics) with that of patients refractory to both cBTKi and BCL2i (double-refractory [DR]), and to investigate the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in these settings. Overall, 47 patients were included. Of these, 40 patients entered the study in SRHR status, and 7 patients in DR status. Because 17 patients evolved from having SRHR to DR status over time, the total DR population comprised 24 patients. In the SRHR cohort, 78% had cBTKi-refractory and 22% had BCL2i-refractory disease, and TP53 abnormalities were in present in 90% of the patients with SRHR. Median event-free survival (defined as progression on next line, or death) of the SRHR cohort was 22 months; and median overall survival (OS) of the SRHR and DR cohorts was 51 and 21 months, respectively. A total of 22 patients underwent alloHCT; their nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and OS at 2 years was 19%, 19%, 62%, and 67%, respectively. Although long-term progression-free survivors were observed after transplantation, exploratory comparisons of patients who received a transplant and those who did not did not show a significant OS benefit in favor of alloHCT. In conclusion, the outlook of patients with high-risk single-refractory CLL is dismal but better than in patients with DR disease. In both settings, alloHCT is feasible and may overcome clinical and biological disease refractoriness; however, its exact benefit and timing remain to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.