ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026
Losing genes, gaining edits: how relaxed selection and inverted repeat expansion shape RNA editing in Schizaeaceae plastomes.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional pyrimidine exchange process that alters plastid and mitochondrial transcripts in nearly all land plants. Although confined to organelles, it is directed by nuclear-encoded PLS-type pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, each typically recognizing a specific RNA target. While many editing sites are functionally neutral, edits at cryptic start and internal stop codons have been implicated in modulating organellar gene expression. Ferns-and some lycophytes-are unique among vascular plants in exhibiting both C-to-U and U-to-C editing, making them valuable for studying the evolution of both forms. Here, we examine chloroplast RNA editing in four Schizaeales species (Schizaea dichotoma, Actinostachys digitata, Anemia phyllitidis, Lygodium microphyllum). Schizaea and Actinostachys possess non-photosynthetic gametophytes, providing a natural contrast with fully photosynthetic relatives. Despite extensive plastome reduction, including loss of the ndh suite and, in Actinostachys, all chl genes, Schizaea and Actinostachys exhibit dramatically elevated numbers of C-to-U edits. Genes evolving under relaxed selection accumulate more editing sites, and editing abundance per gene correlates with the magnitude of relaxed constraint, suggesting relaxed selection promotes edit proliferation. Schizaea dichotoma and A. digitata also show expansion of the chloroplast inverted repeat (IR), and genes translocated into the IR exhibit reduced substitution rates and higher editing densities, indicating that IR expansion slows the loss of edits. Finally, annotation of PPR proteins revealed few full-length editing factors, consistent with catalytic domains assembling in trans and highlighting the modular nature of the fern editosome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.