ArticleScientific reports2026
Association of the C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index with new-onset myocardial infarction risk: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between C-Reactive Protein-Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Adverse Prognosis Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the association between the C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index (CTI) and risk of new-onset myocardial infarction (MI). We conducted a prospective cohort study among participants enrolled in the Kailuan Study in Tangshan City, Hebei Province, China, who underwent the physical examination between June 2006 and October 2007 (n = 101,510). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 94,509 participants were included in the final analysis.The subjects were stratified into four groups according to baseline CTI quartiles: Q1 (CTI < 7.89), Q2 (7.89 ≤ CTI < 8.54), Q3 (8.54 ≤ CTI < 9.19), and Q4 (CTI ≥ 9.19). New-onset myocardial infarction was the main endpoint of the follow-up, which lasted until December 31, 2021.Hazard ratios (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the multivariate-Cox proportional hazards regression model. The cumulative incidence function was constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were performed to assess between-group differences. During a median follow-up of 15.01 (14.65, 15.20) years, 2,062 new-onset myocardial infarctions were documented. As CTI levels increased, the cumulative incidence rates of MI in the Q1 to Q4 groups were 0.86%, 1.60%, 2.12%, and 3.16%, respectively. After adjusting for relevant confounders, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that compared with the Q1 group, the HR (95% CI) for new-onset myocardial infarction in the Q2 to Q4 groups was 1.42 (95% CI 1.21-1.67), 1.69 (95% CI 1.45-1.98), and 2.04 (95% CI 1.74-2.40), respectively. Each 1-unit increment in CTI was associated with a 29% increase in the risk of new-onset MI. Elevated CTI levels are independently associated with a higher risk of new-onset MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.