ArticleScientific reports2026
Contrastive unlearning via representation editing for graph neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graph unlearning (GU) aims to eliminate the influence of specific nodes, edges, or features from a trained graph neural network (GNN), and is of great importance for privacy protection and data quality management. However, existing GU methods often struggle to achieve a satisfactory balance between model utility and unlearning effectiveness, and they also find it difficult to remove the influence of target data and its propagated effects over the graph. To address these issues, we propose a GU framework named CURE based on contrastive representation editing. CURE introduces an adaptive sample selection module to accurately identify key nodes that are highly related to the unlearning targets from both structural and semantic perspectives. It then adopts a contrastive unlearning strategy to decouple the representations of the forgotten nodes from those of their related nodes in the embedding space, thereby effectively removing the information of the forgotten nodes. In addition, to preserve the predictive capacity of the model on the remaining data, we further introduce a personalized PageRank-based stability preservation module, which constrains the consistency of prediction distributions for affected nodes before and after unlearning. The experimental results show that CURE achieves a favorable trade-off among model utility, unlearning efficiency, and unlearning effectiveness, and outperforms existing baseline methods in most experimental settings, while also exhibiting superior privacy protection and robustness.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.