Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286469›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of headache and pain2026

Consistency of response to rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine among real-world users - findings from the prospective observational CONFIDENCE study.

Richard B Lipton, Lucy Abraham, Alexandre Urani, Giorgio Lambru, Peter J Goadsby, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Todd J Schwedt, Kristina M Fanning, Feng Dai, Karin Hygge Blakeman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06467370 (CONFIDENCE), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06467370 completednot on this map

Confidence: a prospective observational study with acute treatment of rimegepant odt on consistency, satisfaction and tolerability of treatment in the real world

TypeobservationalSponsorPfizerRan2024 to 2025Enrolled467ConditionsMigraine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard B LiptonMontefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. richard.lipton@einsteinmed.edu.
Lucy AbrahamPfizer R&D UK Ltd., Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Alexandre UraniAptar Digital Health, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Giorgio LambruThe Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Peter J GoadsbyDivision of Biomedical Sciences, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Patricia Pozo-RosichHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Todd J SchwedtDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Kristina M FanningMIST Research, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA.
Feng DaiPfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Karin Hygge BlakemanPfizer AB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-world data on the effectiveness of rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine is limited, particularly regarding consistency of response over multiple attacks.

methodsCONFIDENCE was a prospective observational survey study with screening and baseline questionnaires; a 28-day observational period where participants completed daily assessments on migraine occurrence, treatment, and outcomes; and an end of study questionnaire. Adults in the United States with 3-14 headache days in the last 30 days, a rimegepant prescription for the acute treatment of migraine, and plans to use rimegepant in the next 30 days were recruited in phases via the Migraine Buddy® app; firstly, those with/without preventive therapies, and then, those taking specific preventive therapies. A primary outcome of CONFIDENCE was consistency of rimegepant response across multiple attacks at the population and participant levels regardless of preventive migraine therapy. Positive treatment outcomes were defined as (1) meaningful pain relief (MPR) within 2 hours, (2) meaningful improvement in function (MIF) within 2 hours, and (3) attacks where participants reported being 'satisfied' or 'extremely satisfied' with rimegepant (treatment satisfaction).

results416 participants recorded data for 2169 rimegepant-treated migraine attacks (median: 7/participant). Participants' mean age was 40 years, 91% were female, 90% were White, and 84% took ≥ 1 preventive therapy. At baseline, participants reported a median (IQR) of 8 (5, 10) headache days/month and 40% had very severe migraine-related disability as measured by the Migraine Disability Assessment score ≥ 41. Among all rimegepant-treated migraine attacks recorded in the study, 61% achieved MPR and 58% achieved MIF within 2 hours, while 68% achieved treatment satisfaction. Of the 349 participants who treated ≥ 3 attacks, favorable outcomes were achieved in ≥ 2 of their first 3 recorded attacks for MPR within 2 hours in 65%, MIF within 2 hours in 60%, and treatment satisfaction in 74%. 55%, 48%, and 66% of participants achieved these outcomes in ≥ 3 of their first 4 attacks (n = 289 participants with ≥4 attacks).

conclusionsConsistently positive treatment outcomes were observed at the population (all attacks) and participant levels in this real-world observational study of > 400 participants and >2000 migraine attacks treated with rimegepant.

trial registrationNCT06467370.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersPiperidinesPyridinesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomePiperidinesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID42286469
PMCPMC13449482

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.