ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2026
Feasibility and acceptability of a multi-level school-based intervention for adolescent mental health in Nepal: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescence is a crucial developmental stage characterized by rapid biological, psychological, and social changes, that increase vulnerability to mental health issues. Nearly half of all mental health conditions have their onset during this period and are influenced by individual, family, and environmental factors. Schools play a key role in promoting mental well-being among adolescents due to their accessibility and reach. While school-based mental health prevention interventions have shown positive outcomes in high-income countries, evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of Health Action in Schools for a Thriving Adolescent Generation (HASHTAG), a comprehensive school-based intervention for adolescents aged 13-16 years in Nepal.
methodsA feasibility cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in four secondary schools in Morang district, Nepal. Adolescents completed surveys at baseline and at a 3-month follow-up to evaluate mental well-being, emotional and behavioral outcomes, social support, school climate, and functioning. The intervention comprised two components: Thriving Environment in Schools (TES), implemented over three months and Thriving Together (TT), delivered through six weekly sessions. Quantitative data were collected electronically and analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data were gathered through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with adolescents, teachers, and facilitators to explore implementation experiences and were analyzed thematically.
resultsBoth the TES and TT components were well received, with TT sessions achieving an average attendance rate exceeding 70%, and being delivered as planned by trained facilitators, indicating good acceptability and feasibility. Explanatory analysis suggested a positive trend in anxiety outcomes in the intervention group while, social support showed a modest increase. Other outcomes showed small, non-significant changes. Qualitative findings highlighted perceived benefits such as improvements in school cleanliness, staff-student relationships, bullying and discrimination reduction, and positive social and behavioral changes. Participants found breathing exercises, games, the workbook, and the 'feeling box' particularly helpful. Implementation challenges included limited space, logistical constraints, COVID-19 related disruptions, and session length.
conclusionHASHTAG demonstrated feasibility and accessibility as a school-based intervention for adolescents in Nepal, with preliminary indications of potential benefits. Addressing identified implementation challenges will be important for optimizing delivery in future studies. A fully powered randomized controlled trial is warranted to evaluate effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.