Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286905›Full record

ReviewCroatian medical journal2026

Artificial intelligence enables scale, consistency, and rigor in forensic identity inference.

Bruce Budowle, Stephen Newman, Nicole Jones, Misty Marra, Kristen Mittelman, David Mittelman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Croatian medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruce Budowle
Stephen Newman
Nicole Jones
Misty Marra
Kristen Mittelman
David MittelmanDavid Mittelman, Othram Inc., The Woodlands, TX, USA, david@othram.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in forensic genomics, which include massively parallel sequencing, dense single nucleotide polymorphism testing, and forensic genetic genealogy (FGG), have greatly expanded the range of cases in which DNA evidence can generate investigative leads. As a result, the primary limitations in modern forensic DNA analysis are no longer analytical sensitivity or marker availability, but the ability to reason consistently, transparently, and at scale over increasingly complex genetic, genealogical, and contextual information. Current forensic workflows remain predominantly human-centered, relying on manual reasoning that is difficult to standardize, reproduce, document, or scale across growing case inventories. The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) is described as an enabling layer for forensic identity inference, defined here as computational decision-support systems that structure, prioritize, and document reasoning over genetic associations, genealogical structures, and investigative context during identity hypothesis development. While formal statistical inference quantifies evidentiary weight, identity inference governs how evidence is explored, combined, and acted upon during investigations. AI-assisted systems can augment, but not replace, expert judgment by supporting scalable prioritization, relational reasoning, and systematic documentation of analytical decisions, while reducing bias. Properly designed AI-enabled systems offer a path to sustainably scaling FGG while supporting scientific rigor, accountability, and public trust.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsHumansIntelligent Systems

Identifiers

PMID42286905
PMCPMC13247748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.