ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Mapping the literature on breast cancer and spirituality: emerging trends and thematic evolution in a 25-year bibliometric analysis.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe absence of a comprehensive bibliometric mapping study addressing breast cancer and spirituality in the literature constitutes a significant gap. Therefore, this study aims to examine research on spirituality in breast cancer from a bibliometric perspective, identify current research trends, illustrate the conceptual evolution of the field, and provide a guiding framework for future research.
methodsThis retrospective bibliometric study analyzed publications on breast cancer and spirituality indexed in the Scopus database between 2000 and August 2025. Bibliometric analyses were conducted using the Bibliometrix package in R and VOSviewer to examine publication trends, citation patterns, collaboration networks, and thematic evolution across 470 eligible articles.
resultsThe United States emerged as the leading contributor in terms of research productivity and citation impact, while countries such as Brazil and Portugal demonstrated notable roles within international collaboration networks. Psycho-Oncology was identified as the most influential journal in this research area, followed by Supportive Care in Cancer. The University of California system was the most prolific institution, and Gall TL was identified as the most prominent author in the field. Thematic analyses revealed a clear progression from early conceptual explorations toward more practice-oriented topics, including spiritual care, spiritual well-being, coping strategies, resilience, quality of life, and the expanding role of nursing and oncology nursing. Recent trends also indicate increasing attention to family caregivers and unmet spiritual needs.
conclusionThis study provides valuable guidance for researchers, academics, and clinical healthcare professionals seeking to strengthen evidence-based spiritual care in oncology settings. The literature on breast cancer and spirituality has expanded substantially over the past 25 years, with a clear shift toward applied and intervention-focused research relevant to clinical practice. Nevertheless, geographic disparities and limited representation from under-resourced regions remain evident. Future research should prioritize inclusive, interdisciplinary, and methodologically rigorous approaches to facilitate the integration of spiritual care into routine clinical practice and to advance holistic, patient-centered breast cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287448What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.