SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Effectiveness of virtual delivery of cancer education for patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient education is critical to effective cancer care; however, many patients experience unmet informational needs due to a lack of accessible, reliable, and comprehensible resources. Virtual education programs have emerged as a promising approach to help patients gain information about their condition. This systematic review with narrative synthesis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual cancer education in terms of knowledge translation and patient satisfaction.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from database inception to April 2025. Studies were screened and data were extracted by two independent reviewers (B.M. and D.S.). Studies that evaluated knowledge translation and patient satisfaction with the virtual intervention were included.
resultsThe search identified 454 studies, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria, including 10 randomized controlled trials. The virtual interventions primarily focused on educating patients about their disease and anti-cancer treatment options, with 17 studies (81%) using web-based interventions, and the remaining studies were delivered via phone, email, or text messaging. Seventeen (81%) studies reported a positive impact of virtual education on knowledge translation, with 9 reporting increased self-efficacy, 3 demonstrating improved informed decision-making, and 3 showing enhanced patient participation during medical consultations. By contrast, 3 studies (14.3%) found no significant effect on knowledge translation. Nine studies (42.9%) provided additional information on psychosocial impact, revealing overall positive effects on emotional well-being and reduced distress. Fourteen studies (67%) reported high patient satisfaction with the virtual intervention, while 6 (28.6%) suggested room for improvement in usability and design.
conclusionVirtual education effectively enhances cancer-specific knowledge and is generally well-received by patients, providing a valuable alternative to in-person sessions. However, variability in outcomes highlights the need for further research into the development of personalized, interactive, and comprehensive approaches to optimize virtual education programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42287464What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.