ReviewInternational journal of epidemiology2026
Estimating and discovering heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning in epidemiological studies: a practical guide.
Review in International journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian Causal Methods for Environmental Accountability Studies with Heterogeneous Effects.Current environmental health reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning-based heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) estimation and discovery have recently received substantial attention in the healthcare literature. In particular, meta-learner frameworks and causal forests have been widely used in estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). Such advances in HTE estimation and discovery have allowed researchers to assess HTE patterns in their data. Here, we provide a comprehensive and practical guide as well as statistical codes for researchers to implement these models effectively. Specifically, we provide an overview of core motivations for HTE analysis. Then, we describe a methodological overview of popular machine learning algorithms for CATE estimation and how to calibrate their model fit. After demonstrating an application example using a national sample of US older adults, we discuss some critical and practical considerations of HTE analysis with highly granular CATE. Finally, we discuss the assessment of HTE, including the scale and reference point, as well as the interpretation of CATE. Overall, this paper aims to equip researchers with both the conceptual understanding and practical tools necessary to apply machine learning-based HTE analysis in epidemiological research, including both randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.