Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42287695›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of epidemiology2026

Estimating and discovering heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning in epidemiological studies: a practical guide.

Toshiaki Komura, Falco J Bargagli-Stoffi, Onyebuchi A Arah, Kosuke Inoue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Toshiaki KomuraDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-1514-3288
Falco J Bargagli-StoffiDepartment of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States.
Onyebuchi A ArahPractical Causal Inference Lab, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9067-1697
Kosuke InouePractical Causal Inference Lab, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States.

Funding

Amazon Web Services (AWS)Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 25ek0210218h0001Japan Science and Technology JPMJPR23R2Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23KK0240Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K02887Karen Toffler Charitable TrustNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute UL1TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning-based heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) estimation and discovery have recently received substantial attention in the healthcare literature. In particular, meta-learner frameworks and causal forests have been widely used in estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). Such advances in HTE estimation and discovery have allowed researchers to assess HTE patterns in their data. Here, we provide a comprehensive and practical guide as well as statistical codes for researchers to implement these models effectively. Specifically, we provide an overview of core motivations for HTE analysis. Then, we describe a methodological overview of popular machine learning algorithms for CATE estimation and how to calibrate their model fit. After demonstrating an application example using a national sample of US older adults, we discuss some critical and practical considerations of HTE analysis with highly granular CATE. Finally, we discuss the assessment of HTE, including the scale and reference point, as well as the interpretation of CATE. Overall, this paper aims to equip researchers with both the conceptual understanding and practical tools necessary to apply machine learning-based HTE analysis in epidemiological research, including both randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic StudiesMachine LearningTreatment Effect HeterogeneityHumansModels, Statisticalcausal inferenceconditional average treatment effecteffect-measure modificationepidemiologyheterogeneous treatment effectmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42287695
PMCPMC13264450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.