ArticleScientific reports2026
Photoacoustic device fingerprints induce bias in deep learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models developed for established medical imaging modalities have shown increasing performance and reliability as a result of scaling efforts. In contrast, model development for emerging modalities such as photoacoustic imaging (PAI) remains challenged by data sparsity, which limits model generalizability and raises the susceptibility to bias. While recent studies in PAI have started to investigate subject-related confounders, the impact of hardware-related confounders remains unexplored, posing a critical risk for failure in multicentric deployment scenarios. We are the first to provide a multicentric analysis of hardware-induced bias in PAI. We analyzed device-specific characteristics in images from four device instances and two peripheral artery disease studies, and trained DL models to classify device origin and disease under varying levels of device-health correlations in the data. We showed that 1) multiple instances of the same PAI device type embed identifiable fingerprints in the images, 2) that DL models can leverage these fingerprints to reach [Formula: see text] accuracy in device detection and critically, 3) when a correlation between device instance and health status is present, models trained for disease diagnosis exploit these device-specific signatures as shortcuts, thereby producing biased and clinically misleading predictions. This research highlights the risk of overestimating algorithm performance when such confounding is overlooked, emphasizing the importance of bias evaluation and explainable artificial intelligence methods to identify potential shortcuts, finally enabling multicentric PAI studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.