ArticleScientific reports2026
Efficient material selection for training occluded mmWave radar-based gesture recognisers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radar-based gesture recognition has emerged as a promising approach for unobtrusive interaction. Unlike camera-based systems, radar sensors can detect gestures through opaque materials, enabling seamless embedding into various everyday objects. However, it remains unclear how to train models efficiently for robust gesture recognition through diverse materials. To investigate this, we collected a dataset of 17,520 gesture recordings performed through 73 everyday materials. By comparing several material-sampling and data-augmentation strategies, we found that a small carefully selected representative subset of training materials was sufficient to match the performance of a classifier trained on the full material dataset. Our results showed that the models trained on 14 quota-sampled materials achieved accuracies of 95.8% and 91.2%, comparable to training on all 73 materials (96.8% and 91.6%) and significantly better than training without material data (66.8% and 65.8%). Among the evaluated sampling approaches, Quota sampling also provided the best overall trade-off between performance and practicality. In contrast, classifiers trained on augmented data performed worse than those trained on actual material-specific data. Taken together, these findings indicate that, for the tested sensor, gesture set, and material collection, carefully selected real-material data offer a practical route to reducing material-specific data collection in radar-based gesture recognition while preserving generalisation. Code, models, and data are available in the public repository, with additional details provided in the supplementary materials: https://gitlab.com/hicuplab/seeing-through .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.