ArticleScientific reports2026
Decision processes in 3D structural MRI schizophrenia classification evaluated with saliency maps.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical decision support systems for psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia can benefit from machine learning models based on neuroimaging data for objective diagnosis, prognosis, and effective treatment selection. Deep learning (DL) models promise to be suitable for this task since they can detect complex patterns in images without the need for prior information about candidate regions. Their downside, however, is the lack of transparency about the decision process. Explainable AI methods address this problem and might be helpful in the clinical translation of DL applications as well as potential biomarker indication. The current study qualitatively and quantitatively evaluates seven DL architectures frequently employed in medical image analyses with gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) for plausibility and finds that only two of the seven models base their decisions in a schizophrenia classification task on plausible structural brain information, despite similar classification performance. Furthermore, we develop an approach to translate the saliency maps from the Grad-CAM into universally interpretable anatomical markers of schizophrenia and find candidate regions corresponding to known markers of schizophrenia. To conclude, this study demonstrates the necessity of using explainable methods alongside DL approaches and the feasibility to derive biomarkers with such methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.