ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning approaches for predicting differentiated thyroid cancer recurrence using thyroglobulin levels and whole-body scans: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although thyroid cancer generally has a good prognosis, some patients are prone to recurrence. Multiple factors influence recurrence risk. Machine learning (ML) algorithms offer potential for more accurate and precise prediction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate recurrence related factors in thyroid cancer patients using ML algorithms. This retrospective cohort study included patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who, after undergoing total thyroidectomy and ablation with radioactive iodine (RAI) were followed up over a ten-year period. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and treatment details were extracted from medical records. Six ML algorithms were employed including logistic regression, Naïve Bayes classifier, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost and LightGBM. A total of 355 patients were included (mean age: 41.69 [Formula: see text] 14.04 years, 84.22% female). Among ML algorithms, XGBoost demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 97.66(± 2.34) % and an area under the curve of 0.99. The top predictors were the number of recurrences, first-year stimulated thyroglobulin level, regional node involvement, and first response to treatment, respectively. This study also proposed the use of whole-body scans only for high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.