SynthesisPediatric research2026
EEG signatures of motor development in early childhood: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of motor developmental disorders is limited due to lack of objective neural markers that characterize typical neurodevelopmental patterns. This systematic review interprets and synthesizes existing evidence to propose a framework of EEG signatures associated with motor development in children aged 0-5 years, which may help inform future benchmarks for early assessment and intervention.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched published and gray literature across five databases between 2000 and 2025 (registered protocol). Included studies examined EEG during task-based, resting-state, or sleep studies linked to motor milestones, task performance, or standardized motor assessments. Study quality was assessed using the NIH tool.
resultsFrom 35 studies including 1107 neurotypical children, we identified four study types: action observation, action execution, combined observation/execution, and resting/sleep EEG. Mu rhythm desynchronization (6-13 Hz) emerged as the most common marker of motor maturation, with mu peak increasing from 6-9 Hz in infants to 8.5-10 Hz in preschoolers. Motor experience strengthened neural responses, sleep features (slow-wave activity and spindles) predicted future motor outcomes, and beta oscillations supported action prediction and coordination.
conclusionEEG shows promise as a non-invasive tool for tracking early motor development. However, methodological heterogeneity underscores the need for standardized research before EEG can reliably identify atypical development or monitor intervention response. IMPACT: This review synthesizes EEG signatures in children 0-5 years and shows that mu rhythm desynchronization (6-13 Hz) is the most common correlate of early motor development. First review to combine task-based EEG (watching and doing actions) with resting and sleep EEG in this age group. This review identifies EEG features, including alpha and beta rhythms, slow-wave activity, spindles, and connectivity patterns linked to motor skills, suggesting their potential as early objective correlates of typical motor development.
Identifiers
42288640What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.