ReviewWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2026
Transplantation of encapsulated fecal microbiota: research progress and future trends.
Review in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) demonstrates significant efficacy in treating intestinal disorders, such as recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). However, traditional FMT relies on invasive delivery methods (e.g., colonoscopy or use of a nasoenteric tube) and lacks standardized donor screening, limiting its widespread clinical adoption and scalability. As a key formulation of live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), encapsulated FMT represents a transition from empirical microbial transfer to engineered biotherapeutics, offering a safer and more convenient approach for clinical application. DATA SOURCES: This review synthesizes, compares, and integrates data in a narrative fashion from PubMed and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure.
resultsResearch on encapsulated FMT in adults has progressed toward standardization and the exploration of new indications. In contrast, pediatric studies remain primarily focused on rCDI treatment and lack large-scale randomized controlled trials. Evolution toward encapsulated, standardized products is driving a shift from whole-community microbial formulations toward more defined consortia and, ultimately, synthetic biology-based innovations. Concurrent significant regulatory challenges persist, as definitions of LBPs remain inconsistent and clear, harmonized international guidelines are yet to be established.
conclusionsThis review summarizes progress and emerging research priorities in encapsulated FMT while also examining current regulatory challenges and innovative directions within the LBP framework. Future developments are poised to advance encapsulated FMT from whole-community transplantation toward the precise modulation of functional microbial consortia. This progression will help drive microbial therapeutics toward greater standardization and personalization, offering improved treatment strategies for intestinal and other microbiome-associated diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42288685What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.