SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
The risk of congenital malformations and neonatal outcomes among singletons and twins born after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-regression analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) have been widely used for infertility treatment, concerns still persist towards the potential risks of congenital malformations and adverse neonatal outcomes. In this work, we estimate the risk of congenital malformations and neonatal outcomes among singletons and twins born after IVF or ICSI.
methodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched to identify eligible studies. A Bayesian network meta-regression model was used to synthesize direct and indirect evidence. The natural logarithm of the hazard ratio (lnHR) and its standard error (SElnHR) were calculated to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for the number of fetuses. The primary outcome was congenital malformations (CM). All analyses were performed using RStudio version 4.3.1.
resultsA total of 24 studies were included in the Bayesian network meta-regression, comprising 105,152 IVF, 254,538 ICSI, and 4,048,050 spontaneous conception (SC) pregnancies. Compared with SC, singletons conceived by IVF and ICSI showed higher risks of CM (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.19-1.48; HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.35-1.62). For circulatory system malformations, singletons conceived by ICSI had a higher risk than those conceived by SC (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19-1.87) and IVF (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.04-1.93). Among twins, ICSI was associated with increased risks of CM (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.32), preterm birth (PTB) (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.98), and perinatal death (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.12-2.45). Singletons conceived by IVF also showed higher risks of PTB (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10-2.22) and low birth weight (LBW) (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.21).
conclusionsBoth IVF and ICSI were associated with higher risks of congenital malformations in singletons, while only ICSI was associated with elevated risks in twins. IVF was associated with increased risks of preterm birth and low birth weight in singletons, whereas ICSI was associated with greater risks of circulatory malformations in singletons and preterm birth and perinatal death in twins. These findings may assist clinicians in counseling ART patients about potential risks and underscore the importance of vigilant perinatal monitoring, rather than serving as direct clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.