Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288938›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2026

Predicting unfavorable tuberculosis outcomes using machine learning: a prospective cohort.

Taehyung Lee, Inseo Choi, Hoyoun Lee, Hyung Woo Kim, Eung Gu Lee, Yeonhee Park, Sung Soo Jung, Jin Woo Kim, Jee Youn Oh, Heayon Lee and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Taehyung LeeMedical Service Division, Korea Army Training Center, Nonsan, Republic of Korea.
Inseo ChoiCollege of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Hoyoun LeeArtificial Intelligence Research Center, JLK Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyung Woo KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eung Gu LeeDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeonhee ParkDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Soo JungDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jin Woo KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jee Youn OhDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heayon LeeDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hoon KimDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Hyung KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Jiwon LyuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Sun Jung KwonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Jeong JeongDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon-Kyoung KooDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Ju Sang KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jinsoo MinDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. minjinsoo@catholic.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea National Institute of Health 2025E200100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) continues to be a primary cause of mortality from a singular infectious agent worldwide, with a significant number of patients still encountering unfavorable outcomes such as treatment failure, relapse, or death. Early identification of high-risk individuals is essential for optimizing clinical management, yet conventional statistical approaches often fail to capture the complex, nonlinear interactions among clinical predictors. Machine learning (ML) presents a promising alternative; however, previous ML-based prognostic studies in TB have been constrained by small sample sizes, retrospective designs, or insufficient external validation.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study in Korea using two prospective cohort databases (2016-2024). Adults with newly diagnosed drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis were divided into training and external validation sets by institutions. Five machine learning models were created, and optimized decision thresholds to get the highest F2-score. We used the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve to measure performance. Feature importance was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values and compared with multivariate logistic regression.

resultsAmong 1580 participants, 109 (6.9%) experienced unfavorable outcomes. The XGBoost model demonstrated the best discriminative ability, achieving an AUROC of 0.818, and successfully identifying 73.3% of unfavorable outcomes by assessing the top 20% of patients at highest risk. SHAP analysis identified serum albumin, hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, and age as the most significant predictors. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that serum albumin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.492; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.325-0.743; p < 0.001) and hemoglobin (aOR, 0.858; 95% CI 0.756-0.973; p = 0.017) were independent protective factors of statistical significance. Conversely, a model that excluded laboratory data exhibited diminished performance, with an AUROC of 0.741.

conclusionsThe successful external validation confirmed the high predictive accuracy and generalizability of the ML models, with XGBoost demonstrating the most promising results in forecasting tuberculosis outcomes. Both ML and statistical analyses identified serum albumin and hemoglobin as primary predictors, whereas the ML model also incorporated the prognostic significance of lymphocyte count. These results show that common signs of nutritional and immune health are important factors in predicting the course of tuberculosis.

Indexed as

HemoglobinLymphocyte countMachine learningNutritional statusProspective cohortSerum albuminTreatment outcomeTuberculosisXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42288938
PMCPMC13274168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.