Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288966›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

For Me, Quality of Life Is When I Get Through the Day Without Thinking: I Won't Make It: A Participatory Qualitative Study of Health-Related Quality of Life in Rare Liver Diseases.

Anouck Alary, Jane Sattoe, Lynda Sifer-Rivière, Isabelle Aujoulat, José Mira, Guenda Bernegger, Giada Danesi, Eva Gil-Hernández, Pura Ballester, Mercedes Guilabert and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Anouck AlaryINSERM, Aix-Marseille Univ, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), CALIPSO team, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8930-653X
Jane SattoeRotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lynda Sifer-RivièreINSERM, Aix-Marseille Univ, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), CALIPSO team, Marseille, France.
Isabelle AujoulatUCLouvain, Institute of Health & Society, Academic Centre for health promotion-RESO, Brussels, Belgium.
José MiraMiguel Hernandez University of Elche, Department of Health Psychology, Elche, Spain.
Guenda BerneggerSUPSI (University of Applied Sciences and Arts in Southern Switzerland), DEASS (Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care), CPPS (Competence Centre for Healthcare Practices and Policies), Manno, Switzerland.
Giada DanesiSUPSI (University of Applied Sciences and Arts in Southern Switzerland), DEASS (Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care), CPPS (Competence Centre for Healthcare Practices and Policies), Manno, Switzerland.
Eva Gil-HernándezFISABIO, Atenea Research Group, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.
Pura BallesterFISABIO, Atenea Research Group, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.
Mercedes GuilabertFISABIO, Alicante-Sant Joan Healthcare District, Alicante, Spain.
Doortje NipiusRotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeanina Kousemaker-NieuwdorpRotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kay van der Meer-KuiperRotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefania CannavòSUPSI (University of Applied Sciences and Arts in Southern Switzerland), DEASS (Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care), CPPS (Competence Centre for Healthcare Practices and Policies), Manno, Switzerland.
Cecile DrossartINSERM, Aix-Marseille Univ, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), CALIPSO team, Marseille, France.
Liliane VeniatINSERM, Aix-Marseille Univ, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), CALIPSO team, Marseille, France.
María Caiata ZuffereySUPSI (University of Applied Sciences and Arts in Southern Switzerland), DEASS (Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care), CPPS (Competence Centre for Healthcare Practices and Policies), Manno, Switzerland.
Agnes DumasINSERM, Aix-Marseille Univ, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), CALIPSO team, Marseille, France.

Funding

ANR ANR-21-RAR4-0005European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme EJP RD COFUND-EJP N° 825575FWO (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - Vlaanderen)Instituto de Salud Carlos III (reference AC21_2/00029)SNF (Swiss National Science Foundation)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular liver diseases (VLDs) predominantly affect young adults and require lifelong monitoring. The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with VLDs is deteriorated, with high levels of fatigue and depressive symptoms, but their lived experience and unmet needs remain unknown. To fully integrate the patients' perspective and generate actionable insights, we conducted a qualitative peer-research study.

methodsTwelve peer researchers conducted interviews with patients in France, Spain, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. Analysis proceeded in three phases: individual inductive thematic analysis independently made by peer and academic researchers, followed by an international workshop to build a shared thematic framework. Third, directed content analysis, informed by the shared framework, was made by an academic researcher.

resultsFrom 27 interviews, five themes were identified, mapping the disease's impact on quality of life from diagnosis onward, and throughout the patient journey. First, the diagnosis trajectory was characterised by 'uncertainty and biographical disruption'. Then, long-term symptoms were described as impacting daily life through the experience of 'chronic uncertainty, loss of ability and social exclusion'. Participants' accounts also reflected the social impact of VLDs, which resulted in 'renegotiating roles, ties and identities'. All along the care journey, their healthcare experience could be marked by 'relational and institutional gaps shaping illness experience'. Finally, 'the sense of belonging to a community of peers' was highlighted as a potential but lacking resource.

conclusionsLiving with a rare VLD involves uncertainty, unpredictable fatigue, stigma, and social disruption, alongside efforts to maintain dignity and autonomy. While patients can demonstrate resilience, this does not negate ongoing needs. Improving quality of life requires addressing not only symptoms such as fatigue, anxiety or sexual dysfunction but requires guidance on physical activity, nutrition or occupational and financial challenges. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Ten patients and two caregivers were involved as peer researchers throughout the study, ensuring that priorities, interpretations, and conclusions reflected patient-defined concerns. All peer researchers contributed to the design, data collection and analysis activities. Due to professional and health constraints, about half of the PRs could only participate in the first local analysis phase. PRs were financially compensated.

Indexed as

Liver DiseasesQuality of LifeRare DiseasesAdultAgedFatigueFemaleFranceHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQualitative ResearchSpainUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42288966
PMCPMC13264678

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.