Evidence mapPaperPMID 42289013Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2026

Current biomarker development in myotonic dystrophies.

Malin Larsen, Daniel H Mendelsohn, Felix Kleefeld, Peter Meinke, Benedikt Schoser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malin LarsenDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, LMU Clinics, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6820-0583
Daniel H MendelsohnDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, LMU Clinics, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9172-6031
Felix KleefeldDepartment of Neurology, Berufsgenossenschaftliches University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0643-7313
Peter MeinkeDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, LMU Clinics, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-3837
Benedikt SchoserDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, LMU Clinics, Munich, Germany. Benedikt.Schoser@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-8131

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions HORIZON-MSCA-2023-DN-01HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions Project 101169266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophies (DM) are autosomal dominant, multisystemic disorders characterized by myotonia and progressive muscle weakness. Extramuscular multisystem symptoms include involvement of the respiratory, cardiac and central nervous systems, and endocrine and autoimmune alterations. While there is significant overlap in key symptoms due to a shared molecular backbone of alternative splicing, DM1 and DM2 differ in genetic origin, disease progression, and aspects of molecular pathology. Currently, DM management focuses on symptoms, and the wide clinical variation leads to long diagnostic delay. This highlights the need for reliable biomarkers to aid diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring. As the understanding of molecular mechanisms in DM improves, new therapies are rapidly emerging, further emphasizing the need for reliable biomarkers to assess short- and long-term treatment efficacy. This review covers current biomarker research, including imaging-based, muscle-derived, and soluble liquid biopsy approaches. While established DM biomarkers are limited, with research disproportionately focused on DM1, multiple markers of alternative splicing pathology show promise. However, their reliance on invasive sampling restricts cohort size and longitudinal assessment. Consequently, efforts are shifting toward developing minimally invasive biomarkers. While some soluble markers, like muscle-specific circulating microRNAs, correlate with clinical measures, inconsistent detection, and limited evaluation of disease specificity point to the need for further research in larger, more diverse longitudinal cohorts. Future progress will depend on validating existing candidates, discovering new biomarkers addressing these limitations, and reducing the imbalance between DM1- and DM2-focused research to advance DM diagnosis, management, and therapy development.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMyotonic DystrophyAnimalsHumansBiomarkersAlternative splicingBiomarkersImaging biomarkersMuscle-derived biomarkersMyotonic dystrophySoluble biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42289013
PMCPMC13265606

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.