ArticleChemistryOpen2026
Core-Sheath Nanofibers From a Modified Coaxial Electrospinning for Transdermal Delivery of Finasteride.
Article in ChemistryOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional blending electrospinning has a series of issues during implementation, and the corresponding monolithic nanofibers can always be updated through the intentional design of core-sheath nanostructures. In this study, a modified coaxial electrospinning approach was employed to refine the electrospinning process by eliminating abnormal phenomena, while simultaneously imparting core-sheath nanostructures and improved transdermal finasteride (FIN) delivery performance. Using an electrospinnable ethylcellulose (EC) solution containing FIN as the core fluid and an unspinnable polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution as the sheath fluid, medicated core-sheath nanofibers (E3) were fabricated continuously and robustly. The monolithic nanofibers (E2) from a conventional blending electrospinning were prepared as a comparison. FIN existed in an amorphous state within both E2 and E3 nanofibers, attributed to its excellent compatibility with EC. The sustained release profiles of nanofibers E2 and E3 are similar, but the penetration rates of FIN molecules from the nanofibers E2 and E3 always have significant differences from the initial tests at 0.5 h (10.32 ± 4.31% and 12.85 ± 5.14% for nanofibers E2 and E3, respectively) to the final tests at 4.0 h (38.16 ± 5.47% and 51.31 ± 5.19% for nanofibers E2 and E3, respectively). The mechanism underlying the robust preparation enabled by the unspinnable sheath fluid is proposed: it prevents multiple abnormal phenomena inherent to single-fluid blending processes. This protocol offers a versatile strategy to upgrade traditional single-fluid blending electrospinning products, endowing them with an improved functional performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.