SynthesisScientific reports2026
Uncovering core regulators of multi-abiotic stress adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana through integrative meta-analysis and machine learning with RT-qPCR validation.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity impose substantial constraints on agricultural productivity, underscoring the need to decipher the core transcriptional programs that underlie plant resilience. Here, we performed an integrative meta-analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptomes exposed to drought, salt, and abscisic acid (ABA) treatments. The three stresses exhibited distinct transcriptional architectures: salt stress triggered the most extensive reprogramming (957 DEGs), dominated by pronounced induction of ERF transcription factors (32 genes); drought induced a moderate response (634 DEGs), with NAC (9 genes) and MYB (8 genes) families most represented; and ABA elicited the smallest transcriptional shift (608 DEGs), characterized primarily by ERF and NAC regulators (9 genes each). From the shared stress-responsive gene set, a consensus machine learning framework integrating XGBoost, Random Forest, and AdaBoost identified eight high-confidence predictive biomarkers. To focus on novel discoveries, four candidates with less-established roles in stress signaling-At5g50360, At1g73480, At3g46230, and At1g16850-were prioritized for experimental validation. RT-qPCR analysis confirmed their robust induction under osmotic stress, while the weaker responses of At3g46230 and At1g16850 to exogenous ABA reflected their distinct cis-regulatory architectures, indicating activation through ABA-independent or combinatorial pathways. To link these hub genes to upstream regulation, Pearson correlation analysis across all biological replicates revealed strong positive correlations with ten commonly upregulated TFs (r = 0.67-0.90) and consistent negative correlations with a downregulated repressor (At5g28770, r = - 0.47 to - 0.74), consistent with both activation and de-repression mechanisms. Protein-protein interaction networks further positioned these genes within key stress-related modules, including ABA signaling, lipid metabolism, chaperone networks, and osmotic stress adaptation. Collectively, the integration of large-scale transcriptomic meta-analysis, ensemble machine learning, co-expression analysis, interaction network modeling, and experimental validation defines a conserved abiotic stress-responsive transcriptional signature and prioritizes candidate regulators for future functional characterization in plant stress biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.