Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289605›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Normative data and clinical usability of the brief examination of social abilities: a novel screening test for social cognition.

Maria Franca, Chiara Gramegna, Desirè Carioti, Caroline Levi Morenos, Gaia Sangalli, Laura Perucca, Stefano Zago, Nadia Bolognini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria FrancaDepartment of Medicine & Surgery, PhD Program in Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy. m.franca@campus.unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0333-2929
Chiara GramegnaDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Desirè CariotiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Caroline Levi MorenosLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Gaia SangalliLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Laura PeruccaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Stefano ZagoFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Policlinico, Neurology Unit, Milan, Italy.
Nadia BologniniDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. nadia.bolognini@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-8658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial cognition impairments are common across neurological and psychiatric conditions and are associated with poor functional outcomes, yet their systematic assessment in routine clinical practice remains limited. This study aimed to introduce a novel screening battery for social cognition, the Brief Examination of Social Abilities (BE-Social), to provide Italian normative data and evidence on its clinical usability.

methodsThe BE-Social assesses various socio-cognitive abilities (i.e., social perception, Theory of Mind (ToM), empathy, and social norm understanding) through seven tasks administered in approximately 15 min. Normative data were collected from 466 healthy adults, and clinical usability was assessed in 76 patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders. Psychometric properties, including internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity, were examined. Normative adjustments were derived using the Equivalent Score method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to evaluate discriminative accuracy.

resultsThe BE-Social shows satisfactory internal consistency (McDonald's ω = 0.83) and moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.66). Its score is associated with standardized measures of emotion recognition and ToM, but not with executive functions, attention, or memory, supporting its specificity. Age and education, but not sex, significantly predict performance. The BE-Social demonstrates good accuracy in distinguishing socio-cognitively impaired from non-impaired patients (AUC = 0.82). In patients, BE-Social scores are associated with emotion recognition, ToM, and social norm understanding, with these associations remaining significant after controlling for global cognitive functioning.

conclusionsThe BE-Social is a brief, reliable, and clinically feasible screening tool for assessing social cognition, supporting its use in routine assessment across neurological and psychiatric populations.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsSocial CognitionSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsTheory of MindYoung AdultNeuropsychological assessmentNormative dataScreening testSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID42289605
PMCPMC13265596

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.