Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289619›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular toxicology2026

Interpretable Machine Learning in Heavy Metal-Associated Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease: A Review of Current Methodologies, Toxicological Insights, and Clinical Implications.

Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Amal A Alsubaiei, Najat Y AlSejari, Mohanad A Alkuwaiti, Bayan Mahafdah, Hamza A Abdul-Hafez, Ahmed Elmorsy Mohamed, Ahmed W Hageen, Abdullah M Alharran, Giuseppe Andò and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ahmed Farid GadelmawlaFaculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt. Ahmedsaid140000@gmail.com.
Amal A AlsubaieiKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Najat Y AlSejariKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Mohanad A AlkuwaitiCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Bayan MahafdahFaculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Hamza A Abdul-HafezDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An- Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. s11940956@stu.najah.edu.
Ahmed Elmorsy MohamedDepartment of Internal Medicine, One Brooklyn Health Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Ahmed W HageenFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Abdullah M AlharranCollege of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.
Giuseppe AndòAzienda Ospedaliera Papardo, Messina, Italy.
Wilbert S AronowDepartments of Medicine and Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metals, including lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg), are pervasive environmental toxicants increasingly recognized as nontraditional contributors to cardiovascular and cardiometabolic disease. Large-scale epidemiology and mechanistic studies link chronic low-to-moderate exposure to hypertension, atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure (HF), and premature cardiovascular mortality. Concurrently, exposure science has shifted from single-pollutant models to high-dimensional "exposome" frameworks that must address correlated mixtures, non-linear dose-response, and subgroup heterogeneity. Machine learning (ML) methods can; learn these complex patterns, but clinical and policy translation requires interpretability: understanding which metals drive risk, how risk changes across exposure ranges, and where interactions amplify harm. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary interpretable ML approaches as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), partial dependence tools, Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR), and mixture-caausal methods, with toxicological mechanisms and clinically relevant outcomes. We integrate evidence from recent NHANES analyses, electronic medical record (EMR) mining, and the All of Us Research Program, highlighting a consistent ML-derived hierarchy wherein cadmium and lead frequently reported as dominant risk drivers for cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes and mortality prediction improvements when metal biomarkers augment standard risk models. We discuss current limitations, cross-sectional designs, residual confounding, measurement error, and variability in model development, and propose a future research agenda highlighting longitudinal cohorts, standardized reporting, causal validation, and integration of omics and real-time exposure monitoring to enable personalized environmental prevention.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsMachine LearningMetabolic DiseasesMetals, HeavyAnimalsCardiometabolic Risk FactorsCardiotoxicityData MiningHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsEnvironmental PollutantsMetals, HeavyArsenicCadmiumCardiovascular diseaseExposomeHeavy metalsInterpretable machine learningLeadMercury

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.