Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289721›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2026

Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among cancer survivors: a population-based cohort study.

Yumeng Liu, Zhongguang Yang, Yulin Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yumeng LiuDepartment of the Second Clinical Medical College, Guizhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550000, Guizhou, China.
Zhongguang YangDepartment of Oncology, Zunyi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China.
Yulin YinDepartment of the Second Clinical Medical College, Guizhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550000, Guizhou, China. 19054132665@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome reflects the interplay of metabolic dysfunction, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the prognostic implications of CKM syndrome stages in this population remain unclear.

methodsData were drawn from the fasting subsample of NHANES III (1988-1994) and NHANES 1999-2018. A total of 2598 cancer survivors aged ≥ 20 years were included. Cox proportional hazards models accounting for the complex survey design were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 7.92 years (IQR: 4.00-12.58), 1165 all-cause deaths, 352 CCD deaths, and 350 cancer deaths occurred. In fully adjusted models, compared with Stage 0, Stage 4 was associated with 3.48-fold higher all-cause mortality (HR = 3.48; 95% CI 2.62-4.63), 7.77-fold higher CCD mortality (HR = 7.77; 95% CI 4.21-14.32), and 2.55-fold higher cancer mortality (HR = 2.55; 95% CI 1.52-4.28). Advanced CKM syndrome was associated with elevated risks of all-cause, and cancer mortality. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

conclusionAdvanced CKM syndrome is independently associated with increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality among U.S. cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsCardio-Renal SyndromeCardiovascular DiseasesMetabolic SyndromeNeoplasmsAdultAgedCause of DeathCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsCancer survivorsCardiovascular diseaseKidney diseaseMetabolic syndromeMortalityNHANES

Identifiers

PMID42289721
PMCPMC13491781

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.