ReviewChemistry, an Asian journal2026
Transforming Molecular Science With Large Language Models: From Molecule Understanding to Autonomous Scientific Discovery.
Review in Chemistry, an Asian journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are driving a paradigm shift in molecular science, transitioning from molecule understanding to autonomous scientific discovery. By learning from multimodal molecular representations through advanced training techniques, LLMs address traditional limitations in molecular research, including expert dependency and limited experimental scalability. We analyze strategies for cross-modal alignment and domain adaptation that enable LLMs to interpret complex molecular semantics. This deep semantic understanding translates into broad versatility across key downstream applications, encompassing retrieval tasks like molecule-text matching, prediction tasks like reaction outcome inference, and generative tasks including zero-shot molecule design. Crucially, we highlight how LLMs integrate with robotic platforms to establish closed-loop autonomous discovery systems, where AI agents automate hypothesis generation, experimental planning, and iterative validation. While these advances accelerate exploration of molecular space, persistent challenges remain in scaling experimental validation and bridging symbolic reasoning with physical experimentation. This review provides a comprehensive roadmap for leveraging LLMs to redefine scientific discovery in molecular science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.