ReviewZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2026
[Research Advances in ctDNA-MRD Monitoring in Local Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].
Review in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains at risk of recurrence after local treatment, and early identification of molecular residual disease before radiological progression is an important issue in risk stratification. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based molecular residual disease (MRD) monitoring provides a promising molecular tool for recurrence risk assessment, response evaluation, and subsequent treatment stratification. However, surgery, thermal ablation, definitive chemoradiotherapy, and stereotactic body radiotherapy differ in tumor burden changes, tissue injury, and DNA release and clearance, leading to uncertainty regarding sampling time points, result interpretation, and clinical utility. This review summarizes recent advances in ctDNA-MRD monitoring after local treatment for NSCLC, focusing on ctDNA kinetics, candidate assessment windows, assay platform differences, prognostic value, and translational limitations in perioperative, thermal ablation, and radiotherapy settings. Current evidence suggests that perioperative ctDNA-MRD status is associated with pathological response, recurrence risk, and survival outcomes. In contrast, direct evidence after thermal ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy remains limited, and proposed sampling time points should be regarded as candidate assessment windows rather than standardized recommendations. Further studies with standardized sampling, assay validation, and prospective interventional designs are needed to clarify the clinical value of ctDNA-MRD in adjuvant treatment selection, intensified surveillance, and individualized management. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.