ArticleProteins2026
Impact of Stabilizing Osmolytes on the Conformational Dynamics of Human and Rat Islet Amyloid Polypeptides.
Article in Proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aggregation of human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) into cytotoxic oligomers and amyloid fibrils is a hallmark of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), leading to pancreatic β-cell dysfunction. In contrast, rat IAPP (rIAPP) is largely non-amyloidogenic. Osmolytes such as glucose, glycerol, and sorbitol are known to stabilize globular protein structures; however, in the case of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), they modulate amyloidogenic aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner. Understanding the molecular mechanism of action of these osmolytes on IDPs remains limited. Well-tempered bias exchange metadynamics (WT-BEMD) simulations were used to study the conformational energy landscape of hIAPP and rIAPP in solution across varying osmolyte concentrations (125, 250, and 500 mM). The addition of osmolytes resulted in subtle changes in secondary structure propensity and content in both hIAPP and rIAPP. In the case of hIAPP, a general reduction in the likelihood of α-helical conformations was observed, particularly in the amyloidogenic core, suggesting a molecular mechanism for reduced aggregation in the presence of osmolytes. There was a notable lack of significant direct H-bonding and hydrophobic protein-osmolyte interactions, confirming the presence of a strong osmophobic effect. These findings suggest that these stabilizing osmolytes influence the conformational ensemble of hIAPP and rIAPP through exclusion from the protein surface, rather than by directly stabilizing specific conformations. The potential osmolyte-mediated reduction in aggregation-prone conformations in IDPs such as hIAPP may disrupt early aggregation and offer a potential strategy to mitigate hIAPP cytotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.