ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026
Effects of cleaning agents and
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The effects of Materials: A total of 240 PMMA (Travelon™) and nano-filled composite (Filtek™ Z350XT) specimens were fabricated. Baseline surface hardness VHN, arithmetic mean surface roughness (Sa, in nm), and flexural strength (ISO 20795-1) were measured. The specimens underwent a Results: In comparison to PMMA (98.60 ± 0.55 VHN; p < 0.001, η² = 0.92), the nano-filled composite showed significantly greater baseline hardness (156.67 ± 0.58 VHN) and surface smoothness (Sa = 75.60 ± 5.20 nm vs. 256.30 ± 18.50 nm; p < 0.001, η² = 0.89). Greater PMMA surface roughness was associated with significantly higher biofilm accumulation and mechanical deterioration (14.14% flexural strength decrease; p < 0.001). Significant degradation occurred after exposure to NaOCl, and PMMA showed the greatest flexural strength loss (36.13%; p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant material degradation was observed with patchouli extract (p > 0.05). Both disinfectants demonstrated limited efficacy against mature biofilms, whereas NaOCl was highly effective against planktonic Conclusion: In comparison to PMMA, nano-filled composite had superior surface and mechanical properties associated with enhanced resistance to chemical and biofilm-related deterioration. However, the constraints of the mono-species model warrant potential clinical consideration. NaOCl demonstrated substantial antifungal activity but was associated with severe material degradation, whereas patchouli extract preserved material integrity but exhibited modest anti-biofilm efficacy. Therefore, material-specific cleaning protocols might be warranted. Further investigation of complex models is necessary to balance antimicrobial effectiveness against long-term prosthetic durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.