ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Artificial intelligence and wearables in sport: performance, injury risk, and wellbeing.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and wearable technologies has reshaped contemporary sport practice by enabling continuous, multidimensional athlete monitoring. Wearable systems generate high-frequency physiological, biomechanical, and behavioral data; however, meaningful interpretation of these datasets requires advanced analytical approaches. This mini review synthesizes current evidence on the combined application of AI and wearable technologies in sport, with emphasis on performance optimisation, injury risk estimation, return-to-play decision support, and athlete wellbeing. The literature indicates that AI-driven models can enhance individualized training prescription, improve workload regulation, and support early identification of maladaptive patterns. Nevertheless, predictive accuracy and practical utility remain highly dependent on data quality, model validation, contextual interpretation, and practitioner expertise. Ethical considerations, including data privacy, algorithm transparency, and responsible governance, represent additional challenges for widespread implementation. Overall, the findings support a human-in-the-loop framework in which AI functions as an advanced decision-support tool rather than an autonomous authority. When applied within structured and context-aware practice models, AI-integrated wearable systems may contribute to more adaptive, individualized, and sustainable athlete management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.