ReviewFrontiers in allergy2026
CRSwNP in the biologics era: evaluating patient-reported quality of life outcomes.
Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent type 2 inflammatory disorder that substantially impairs patient quality of life (QoL) through cardinal symptoms of nasal obstruction, olfactory dysfunction, and sleep disturbance, further compounded by frequent comorbidities including asthma and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD). While conventional therapies with intranasal corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, and endoscopic sinus surgery remain foundational, their limitations in achieving durable disease control have prompted the emergence of biologic agents targeting key type 2 inflammatory pathways. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from a targeted literature search including randomized controlled trials and complementary real-world studies to evaluate the impact of biologic therapies on patient-reported QoL outcomes in severe CRSwNP. Biologic agents targeting key mediators of type 2 inflammation have consistently demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in disease-specific QoL, as measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), across nasal, sleep, olfactory, and emotional domains, with consistent benefits regardless of comorbidities or prior surgery. Real-world evidence corroborates trial findings, demonstrating sustained QoL benefits and reduced dependence on systemic corticosteroids and revision surgery. The integration of patient-reported outcome measures into therapeutic decision-making bridges the gap between objective clinical metrics and lived disease burden, informing patient-centered care models. Biologic therapies have redefined success in CRSwNP management by consistently delivering multidimensional, durable improvements in patient-reported QoL, head-to-head comparisons and optimized treatment sequencing warrant further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.