ReviewJAMIA open2026
Design and content of health facility routine data recording and reporting forms for maternal, newborn, and child health: a scoping review of literature.
Review in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-quality routine health information systems (RHIS) are critical for improving maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH), to facilitate clinical decision-making and track service delivery. Despite widespread use of health facility data forms for capturing indicators, there are no evidence-based standardized formats or content guidelines for MNCH. The aim of this scoping review was to identify, synthesize, and explore literature related to health facility data forms regarding data-element content, design, and format. Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology, we searched 8 databases and grey literature for research related to health facility data forms for MNCH populations. Eligible reports discussed the content (data elements) and/or design (format) of forms. Data were analyzed using thematic synthesis. Results: We included 54 reports from 47 countries, with most published post-2014. Most reports represented high-mortality MNCH settings and 39% were specific for MNCH content. Structured response formats (e.g., checkboxes and radio buttons) were associated with improved efficiency and data completeness. Few studies involved end users in form design, and only 3 used validated tools to evaluate usability or data quality. One-page, workflow-aligned designs were commonly recommended to reduce cognitive workload. Conclusions: Standardization of MNCH health facility data-form content and format are currently lacking. User-centered design principles are underutilized. Improving form usability, aligning data capture with clinical workflow, and involving frontline health workers in form development can enhance data quality and reduce documentation burden. Future research should evaluate how form design influences diagnostic accuracy, data quality, and quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.