Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42290927›Full record

ReviewJAMIA open2026

Design and content of health facility routine data recording and reporting forms for maternal, newborn, and child health: a scoping review of literature.

Anna Peeler, Stephanie Hammerich-Hille, Moise Muzigaba, Mary Peeler, Yoshiko Sakuma, Nina Gerlach, Ricardo Correia, Theresa Diaz, Elizabeth Katwan, Louise Tina Day

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna PeelerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4113-9714
Stephanie Hammerich-HilleDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Moise MuzigabaDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Mary PeelerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, United States.
Yoshiko SakumaDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Nina GerlachIndependent Consultant, Oldenburg, Germany.
Ricardo CorreiaFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, 4050-290, Portugal.
Theresa DiazDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Elizabeth KatwanDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Louise Tina DayDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-quality routine health information systems (RHIS) are critical for improving maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH), to facilitate clinical decision-making and track service delivery. Despite widespread use of health facility data forms for capturing indicators, there are no evidence-based standardized formats or content guidelines for MNCH. The aim of this scoping review was to identify, synthesize, and explore literature related to health facility data forms regarding data-element content, design, and format. Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology, we searched 8 databases and grey literature for research related to health facility data forms for MNCH populations. Eligible reports discussed the content (data elements) and/or design (format) of forms. Data were analyzed using thematic synthesis. Results: We included 54 reports from 47 countries, with most published post-2014. Most reports represented high-mortality MNCH settings and 39% were specific for MNCH content. Structured response formats (e.g., checkboxes and radio buttons) were associated with improved efficiency and data completeness. Few studies involved end users in form design, and only 3 used validated tools to evaluate usability or data quality. One-page, workflow-aligned designs were commonly recommended to reduce cognitive workload. Conclusions: Standardization of MNCH health facility data-form content and format are currently lacking. User-centered design principles are underutilized. Improving form usability, aligning data capture with clinical workflow, and involving frontline health workers in form development can enhance data quality and reduce documentation burden. Future research should evaluate how form design influences diagnostic accuracy, data quality, and quality of care.

Indexed as

child healthdata accuracydata qualityhealth information systemsindicatorsmaternal healthnewborn healthuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID42290927
PMCPMC13264511

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.