ReviewAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Development, structure, and implementation of cardiometabolic clinics in the United States, with a focus on comprehensive patient care.
Review in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome and associated cardiometabolic risk factors affect over one‑third of US adults, increasing the risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Recently termed cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome, the syndrome contributes to substantial clinical and economic burden. Despite guideline recommendations, affected patients who have multimorbidity often receive suboptimal, fragmented care. Cardiometabolic clinics (CMCs) comprise a multidisciplinary team that deliver comprehensive, preventive care to patients with cardiometabolic risk factors and diseases. This review outlines key considerations for the development, structure, and implementation of CMCs in the US. Initial steps include developing a financial model to demonstrate potential return on investment, defining the target patient population, establishing care delivery and operational plans, such as cost coverage evaluations, and leveraging digital solutions to improve access and engagement. The proposed CMC structure comprises a core team of a navigator and specialist in cardiometabolic diseases, based on two US-based models: the comprehensive care model and Cardiometabolic Center Alliance - Cardiometabolic Center of Excellence model. Training the team across cardiometabolic conditions is essential. Once established, demonstrating a positive return on investment can support expanding the team to additional specialties. Scalability remains crucial due to the rising prevalence of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome. Studies show CMCs increase uptake of guideline-directed medical therapies and improve cardiometabolic outcomes, although larger, long-term studies are needed. Benefits also extend to healthcare providers, including improved communication, greater convenience, and reduced redundant tests and visits, supporting cost savings. CMCs can potentially reduce the clinical and economic burden of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.