ReviewiScience2026
The osteoporotic niche as a metabolic sanctuary for breast cancer dormancy and reactivation: A mechanistic perspective.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bone marrow adipose tissue: fueling breast cancer bone metastasis via pro-tumor mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extended survival in breast cancer marks a major therapeutic success, but the persistence of late-onset bone metastasis remains an unresolved clinical issue. The driver of this latency is not merely the loss of bone mineral density, but rather a fundamental metabolic reprogramming within the aging osteoporotic marrow. Distinct from a simple structural decline, the osteoporotic niche evolves into a "metabolic sanctuary" which is defined as a privileged microenvironmental state that provides disseminated tumor cells with dedicated bioenergetic fuel while simultaneously shielding them from systemic immune and therapeutic pressures. Fueled by marrow adipogenesis, immunosenescence, and disrupted mechanotransduction, this degraded microenvironment actively coaxes dormant tumor cells into reactivation. This mechanistic distinction may offer a plausible hypothesis for the divergent outcomes seen in the D-CARE and ABCSG-18 trials. Pharmacologically preserving bone density alone may prove insufficient if the host's underlying metabolic dysregulation is left unaddressed. Preventing late recurrence implies a need for a paradigm shift: It requires not simple anti-resorptive approaches, but strategies targeting the metabolic crosstalk that disrupts the bone marrow niche.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.