Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291292›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026

Biofabrication for complex tissue regeneration: a scoping review of translational gaps in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.

Shantanu Dixit, Goma Kathayat, Dinesh Rokaya, Ahmad Al Jaghsi, Suphachai Suphangul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shantanu DixitDental Imaging and Diagnostic Center, Ballabgarh, Haryana, India.
Goma KathayatChulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dinesh RokayaCollege of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Ahmad Al JaghsiCollege of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Suphachai SuphangulMahidol University-Phayathai Campus, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Reconstruction of the craniomaxillofacial (CMF) region poses combined structural and biological challenges that are difficult to address using conventional approaches. Although biofabrication has gained attention in this context, its progression across fabrication strategies and stages of translational validation has not been examined in a consolidated manner. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Relevant studies published between 2010 and 2025 were identified and examined using a four-dimensional analytical framework (spatial, biological, temporal, and biomechanical complexity) to evaluate fabrication strategy, construct complexity, bio-additive integration, and translational maturity. Results: Analysis of 107 studies indicated that research activity clustered around a limited set of approaches, most frequently extrusion-based printing (70.1%) in combination with composite material systems (59.8%). Although 21.5% of studies investigated complex multi-tissue constructs, most of these were evaluated exclusively in vitro or in small animal models. Bio-additive incorporation predominantly focused on osteogenic enhancement, with relatively limited attention to angiogenic support. Across studies, outcome reporting favored structural characteristics over assessments of functional recovery. Discussion: These findings highlight a gap between increasing construct complexity in CMF biofabrication and validation in functionally and clinically relevant models. Progress toward translation is likely to depend on closer integration of fabrication strategies, biological design considerations, and function-oriented evaluation frameworks. Systematic Review Registration: Doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FJ87Y.

Indexed as

biofabricationbiomaterialscraniomaxillofacialtissue engineeringtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID42291292
PMCPMC13253785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.