ArticleNature. Mental health2026
Multiscale heterogeneity of atypical functional connectivity in autism.
Article in Nature. Mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Group-mean comparisons often identify atypical functional connectivity in autism, but it remains unclear whether these findings consistently manifest at the individual level. Here we use normative modeling to quantify the interindividual heterogeneity of atypical functional connectivity across multiple brain scales using multicenter resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 1,824 participants (796 autistic individuals and 1,028 neurotypical controls) in a cross-sectional study across 32 sites. We find that no single functional connectivity estimate showed extreme deviation from normative expectations in more than 4% of people in either group. However, these deviations converged on common regions and networks in autistic people, who showed up to double the level of overlap compared with controls. Specifically, autistic participants demonstrated convergent hypoconnectivity in sensorimotor and attention regions and convergent hyperconnectivity between frontoparietal and default mode networks. Functional connectivity deviation patterns significantly predicted social and cognitive abilities. These findings demonstrate that autism exhibits scale-dependent heterogeneity, characterized by normative variability at the connection level but significant convergence at regional and network scales. These convergent regions and networks may be used to identify targets for individualized therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.